Evaluation using your data

Verify MBDD Rail using your data before integrating it.

Using a representative journey, MBDD-Solutions runs the engine, measures the results and documents the limitations. You can then decide to integrate, complete the data or exclude the assessed scope.

This scoped evaluation constitutes the OEM Technical Qualification. It specifies the metrics, produced journeys, sections requiring review and recommended integration conditions.

Selected route Qualified railway positions Sections requiring review Qualified events and rules Documented integration decision

To get started

The useful minimum is often simpler than expected.

For the qualification, we verify whether your positions and a usable progression signal can be compared with an infrastructure reference for the relevant section. This signal may come from speed, odometry or a time-stamped GNSS–inertial chain. The infrastructure reference may be provided by MBDD-Solutions or by your teams.

Time-stamped GPS/GNSS positions

A time-stamped trace, even if some points are missing or precision falls in places.

Time-stamped progression signal

Speed, odometry or a GNSS–inertial chain that tracks the train’s progression.

The sector’s railway infrastructure reference

Infrastructure reference availability is verified for each section. The qualification specifies the source, version, topological coverage, available KPs and objects, and applicable rights. Your own infrastructure reference can be used when it must be authoritative.

Depending on the representative use case

Also qualify event association and monitoring rules.

When your product already receives alerts, camera or LiDAR facts, derived measurements or infrastructure events, the qualification can verify their admission, railway association and expected delivery.

Source fact

Describe what is already produced

Producer, type, timestamp, unit, upstream pipeline, coverage, declared quality and available event dictionary.

Partner rule

Define the expected decision

Observed quantity, section or asset, window, threshold or condition, recipient and expected behaviour when the data is not assessable.

Delivery

Verify the end-to-end result

Available journey, line, track, direction and KP, produced event, rule identifier, evidence, reservations and integration format.

Raw camera media, video and point clouds are not analysed by the engine. The qualification uses the finding, detection or measurement already produced by the source chain.

Association of previously produced camera or LiDAR facts can currently be evaluated through the Embedded Runtime; the corresponding Engine API extension is not active. Infrastructure events remain limited to the profiles, types and coverage governed for the scope.

The principle

The qualification identifies precisely which data must be completed.

You know which file to add, which section to revisit and which result can be measured after completing the data.

  1. Define the decision

    What you want to verify and how to recognise a useful result.

  2. Review the files

    GPS/GNSS, progression, infrastructure reference and, depending on the case, supplied events, coverage and rules.

  3. Qualify the journey

    Select tracks supported by the evidence and flag uncertain passages.

  4. Compare

    Measure review time and the quality of the results obtained.

  5. Choose the next step

    Proceed with integration, complete the data or exclude the assessed scope.

Deliverables

The result, its limits and the files needed to review it.

The output begins with a concise summary. Technical details remain available for those who need to review or reproduce the calculation.

SCOPE

What the qualification must verify

The initial question, selected journeys and the criteria used to assess the result.

QUALITY

Condition of your files

Covered periods, interruptions, time offsets and missing data.

RESULTS

Journeys and sections requiring review

Selected tracks, associated facts, produced events, uncertain sections and the reasons explaining each limitation.

RECOMMENDATION

Results and next step

Measured results and a clear recommendation: integrate, complete the data or exclude the assessed scope.

At the end

An integration decision based on measured results.

At the end of the qualification, the partner has the information needed to proceed with integration, complete the data or exclude the assessed scope. The decision is based on criteria defined before execution and on reproducible results.

  • Integration recommended: the results meet the agreed criteria.
  • Data to complete: an identified gap still prevents the criteria from being met.
  • Scope not suitable: the engine does not sufficiently meet the assessed need.

Take action

Present a representative use case.

Once the need, available data streams and expected decision have been clarified, submit these elements to scope the OEM technical qualification.

Present my use case